
Conference for exchanging opinions with
cashmere trade (manufacturing, distribution and marketing)
&
CCMI
Material Paper
20th April 2007
CCMI
CASHMERE AND CAMEL HAIR
MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE
Japan Representative
Contents:
4. The Background of the Latest
Problems
4-1 Imbalance in the Supply and
Demand
4-2 Distortion in the Price
Structure
4-3 Cashmere Industry – Historical Background
and Complexity in the Supply Chain
4-4 The Proliferation of Foreign
Fibers
5. The admixture of foreign fibers
and the avoidance
5-1 The supply Chain of Chinese
Cashmere Products
5-2 Possibilities of admixture of
foreign fibers
5-3 Trustworthiness and Type of the business of the Supplier
Appendices:
① The outline of CCMI
② “Senken Shimbun” Article(26th January 2007):A series of recalls
③ “Yomiuri Shimbun” Article(27th
January 2007):A series of recalls
④
“Senken Shimbun” Article(8 February 2007): CCMI’s position regarding the series of recalls
It has become a public
knowledge that there have been, in Japan,
several recalls of cashmere products since beginning of the year, as the
relevant products failed to satisfy the standard regulated by the Household
Goods Quality Labeling Act. According to the press, the accumulated volume of
recalls has exceeded an unprecedented number of 800,000 units.
While the quality labelling
problems became highlighted this year, the problem was not formed overnight.
There are complex factors and history unique to the cashmere industry.
Any company found to have
been trading in mislabelled products will suffer huge damage, including loss of
reputation. Such problem, however, could have been avoided by paying a due
attention to, and by enhancing, the quality check system. For this, it is
important to understand the background and to properly recognize the risk as
well as to collect accurate information.
It is very timely to have
this opportunity of exchanging opinions between the cashmere trade
(manufacturing, distribution and marketing) and CCMI. We, CCMI, will present
the background as far as we know in the hope that we will be able to exchange
information and opinions.
CCMI (Cashmere and Camel Hair
Manufacturers Institute) is an international organization of leading processors
of luxury fibers. CCMI was founded in 1984, with a mission of maintaining the
integrity of cashmere and camel hair products through education, information
and industry cooperation, including the followings.
Ø
Education for
maintaining integrity of cashmere products.
Ø
Provision of various
supports and information to the cashmere trades in the fields of manufacturing,
distribution and marketing.
Ø
Arranging a Round Trial
of testing laboratories and the listing of recommended laboratories.
Ø
Encouraging exchange of opinions
and information among testing laboratories, and support of the standardization
of analysis results.
Ø
Offering opinions, as
the sole international cashmere organization, to the governments and
international organizations.
CCMI is not a marketing or
promotional organization.
For more information, please
refer to the attached note and our website (www.cashmere.org)
CCMI conducted testing on the
samples purchased at the retail stores, and arranged independent analysis on
the fiber content at testing laboratories. Subsequently, several cases of
mislabelling were detected, and CCMI issued warnings to the relevant marketers.
The companies who received the warnings from CCMI made their own tests, and
after confirming themselves that the products were actually mislabelled, the
recall was announced through mass media such as national papers.
Mislabelling
of a cashmere product is an illegal act violating the below mentioned laws.
u
The Article 3 of the
Household Goods Quality Labeling Act
u
The Article (3)1 of the
Textile Goods Quality Labeling Code publicly notified by the Minister of
Economy, International Trade and Industry under the aforementioned Law
u
The Item 13 of Article
2(1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act
u
The Article 4(1) of the
Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Mislabeling Prevention
Such problem can be avoided
by paying due attention and by enhancing the quality check system. The ultimate
objective of CCMI is not exposing improper labelling. The actions of CCMI this
time was intended to maintain the confidence in the cashmere products, to
retain fairness in the trade, and consequently to protect the consumers
interest. Such mislabelling, if continued, will become a formidable threat to
all the manufacturers, distributors and marketers in the cashmere trade, and it
is an imminent issue to be tackled within all the sectors in the industry. CCMI
is determined to devote further efforts to prevent the future problem, under
the collaboration with other sectors of the trade.
The latest quality problems
we attribute not to a single cause but to the following four main factors:
Ø
imbalance in the supply
and demand (SD gap),
Ø
distortion in the price
structure,
Ø
the history of cashmere
industry and its complicated supply chain, and
Ø
proliferation of foreign fiber admixture.
(Figure-1)

While the world demand for
cashmere has been increasing for the last several years, the raw material
production in the main producing country, China, is decreasing, and thus the
supply/demand gap (SD Gap) is expanding.
Ø
The Demand
For the past years, the demand
for Chinese cashmere products has been increasing mainly due to the following
factors:
²
rapid increase of the
export of Chinese cashmere products to USA and Europe due to the removal and/or
relaxation of import quota after the entry of China into WTO;
²
continuous strong
economic performance in the USA and Europe;
²
expansion of cashmere
market to the new consumers including younger generations;
²
increase of domestic
consumption in China (now 8 – 9 million units) due to the rapid emergence of
wealthy consumers.
Figure-2

(Source:Export statistics of
China)
(NB):The major part of
the export to HK (Hong Kong) is not for the local consumption, but for the
re-export to third countries.
Ø
The Supply
On the other hand, the
production of the raw material in the main producing country, China, is
decreasing due to the following factors.
²
Local government
policy of prohibiting herding on the grassland and restriction on the number of
goats in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
The
desertification of grassland in Inner Mongolia has created serious
environmental problems including the emission of Asian Dust (Yellow Dust),
which is affecting Japan as well. It is suggested that one of the causes of the
desertification is the excessive grazing and consequent deterioration of
grasslands, by the extensive pasturing of goats which eat up to the root of the
grasses.
A
traditional scenery of grazing

(Source:http://webnews.asahi.co.jp/)
The
traditional scenery of grazing can no longer been seen in most of the Inner
Mongolia.
Under
such circumstances, the local government of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
adopted the policy of prohibiting herding on the grassland, and has widely banned
the pasturing of goats on the grasslands, and obliged breeders to adopt
shed-raising. It is also one of local government’s policies to promote
agriculture by encouraging nomads to settle in one place. Consequently, some
breeders are converting the livestock from goats to sheep or cow, which are
more suitable for shed-raising.
The
decrease of production is progressing not only in Inner Mongolia but also in
other provinces. Chinese central government is increasingly concerned over the
global environment issues, and it is considered that the trend of the decrease
will continue.
²
Change of occupation
and the lack of successor of the goat breeders.
The
drastic growth of economy has generated more employment opportunities, which is
activating the change of occupation by the goat breeders. Children are having
higher education under the “one child policy”, and tend to averse the
succession of livestock farming.
Ø
Imbalance in the Supply and Demand (SD Gap)
There is a view that SD Gap,
such as Table-1, exists in China
Table-1 SD Gap of Cashmere in China Estimate by Golden Eagle Cashmere LLC))
|
|
Export 1,000 units |
Usage Ton |
Raw cashmere Ton |
Dehaired Ca Ton |
Balance needed Ton |
|
Export 100% cashmere |
19,000 |
5,000 –5,500 |
|
|
|
|
Export dehaired Cashmere |
|
3,000– 3,500 |
|
|
|
|
Domestic use of Cashmere sweaters |
800 - 900 |
2,500 –2,800 |
|
|
|
|
Export blend cashmere products |
|
600 – 800 |
|
|
|
|
China produce Raw cashmere |
|
|
9,000 – 10,000 |
5,000–6,000 |
|
|
Import from Mongolia |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
Import from other countries |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
Total |
|
11,100 -12600 |
|
6,800–7,800 |
4,300-4,800 |
(Source:Golden
Eagle Cashmere LLC))
(NB)The above figures are estimated
by Golden Eagle Cashmere LLC. They are not official statistics, and not the
figures collected or composed by CCMI)
Ø
Cost increase factors in China other than SD Gap
²
The reduction of refund
rate of Value Added Tax since January 2004(17%→13%)
²
The appreciation of RMB
against UD Dollar (9% in the past 2 years)
In spite of the
aforementioned severely tight supply and demand situation, it does not seem that
normal market mechanism is working, and it is considered that there is a
distortion in the price structure.
Ø
The Trend of Raw Material Price
The Figure-3 illustrates the
long-term trend of the International Price of raw material (dehaired cashmere)
since 1968. It hit the latest bottom in 2003, (about US$60 per kilo) and
thereafter has been creeping up.
Reflecting the tight supply,
the purchase price of greasy cashmere from the breeders in China is
continuously rising, and it is reported that the export price of dehaired
cashmere has now reached around US$100 per kilo. (a hike of 60 – 70%).
図-3 Schneider
market price indicator(1970 ~)
Schneider Cashmere Market Indicators Global trend since
January 1970

━━ Chinese ━━
Mongolian ━━ Iranian
Ø
The Import Prices to the Consuming Countries
On the other hand, the unit
price of cashmere sweaters exported from China to USA has considerably
decreased since 2004. (The quantity increased about 5 times during 2003 and
2006)
Table-4 Unit Import Price of Cashmere Sweaters from China to
USA(USA Statistics))

The unit price of cashmere
sweaters exported from China to Japan has risen by about 30% (The quantity
decreased during the time)
Table-5 Unit
Import Price of Cashmere Sweaters from China to Japan(Ministry
of Finance)

It is pointed out that there
are two influencing factors; the increasing buying power of mega retailers in
the consuming countries, and the severe price competition among Chinese
processors, the number of which has increased but turnover of individual
processor has generally decreased.
Ø
Retail Price of Cashmere Products
Accurate statistics on the
retails prices of cashmere products does not exist, but the prices, in general,
are stable at a low level in USA. Also in Japan hardly any significant change
in the retail price has been observed. The price hike in the upstream has, for
some reason, not been reflected in the retail price, and it is considered that
some force, other than cost reduction efforts, are creating distortion in the
price structure.
As aforementioned, there are
historical background and complex situation behind the recent problem of
foreign fiber admixture into cashmere products.
Initially, the problem of
foreign fiber admixture and mislabelling were not associated with China. After
the World War Ⅱuntil the 1980s, the cashmere industry enjoyed a
growth in Europe and USA, where mislabelling was widespread, and CCMI was
founded under such situation (1984).
On the other hand, in China,
where 60-70% of world cashmere raw material is produced, there was a dramatic
change since late 1980s. Cashmere had been a National Control Item under the
strict control of the government, and was handled only by few public
organizations such as China Animal Byproducts Export Corporation. However,
Chinese Central Government changed its policy, and the cashmere trade became
open to free trade. As the consequence, a huge confusion called “Cashmere War”
broke out in the late 1980s, and the raw material price recorded the historical
peak. After the liberalization of the trade, numerous individuals and
companies, including those who had had no relationship whatsoever with
cashmere, rushed into the cashmere producing regions and played a keen
competition in the purchase of the cashmere raw material. “People’s Daily” (a
leading Chinese News Paper) of the time expressed the situation as “Million of troops are invading Inner
Mongolia”. (“People’s Daily 20th May 1988)
On the other hand an
uncountable number of small dehairing plants emerged in various regions. In
particular, a massive cluster of small dehairing plant was formed in Qinghe
County, He Bei Province. People’s Daily of 30 May 1988 reports:
【Some small
factories are processing cashmere with poor facilities with abandoned cotton
machines and out-of-date technologies. According to our research, Qinghe County
of He Bei Province is not a cashmere producing region, but in some villages and
communities there, almost all the farmers are equipped with carding machines
and are processing cashmere. An uncountable number of small factories have
emerged like bamboo shoots after the rain (NB Chinese expression for countless),
and a colossal quantity of cashmere is being wasted: the fibers are destroyed;
values are lost in pathetic production yields.】
Several years later,
“Cashmere War” ceased, and the technologies of small factories have generally
improved. However, the number of small factories has further increased, and
now, Qinghe County of He Bei Province is the largest production base and stock
point of cashmere in China. The emergence of numerous small factories after the
“Cashmere War” created a situation, where the traceability is difficult. This
remains the same until today.
The liberalization of the
trade opened the easy access to the raw material, and triggered a drastic
change in the supply chain:
²
emergence of numerous
knitting factories;
²
the dehairers, who
accumulated capital, investing in spinning to build vertical operations;
²
emergence of numerous
subcontract factories, and active use of subcontract system by large factories;
and
²
emergence of numerous
brokers and factory-less operators.
Thus, a highly complex
network throughout the industry has been formulated, and grew further under the
central government’s economy liberalization policy.
The complexity of the supply
chain structure, which enshrouds the history of production, is one of the
factors contributing to the admixture of foreign fibers. When starting business
with a new supplier, it is important to have accurate knowledge on where the
supplier is positioned in the Supply Chain.
It is useful to know the
history of admixture of foreign material and fibers into cashmere products.
Ø
1980s:Admixture
of foreign material into the raw material
During the “Cashmere War” in
the late 1980s, admixture of foreign material by the breeders widely prevailed.
“People’s Daily” of 11th July 1988 reports:
【Nowadays,
admixture of foreign material into cashmere is an open secret in Inner
Mongolia, and in extreme cases, the admixture is a formal part of “production
process”. When we made a research on 70 breeders families, they shamelessly
admitted that they had blended foreign material into their cashmere, and were
very knowledgeable on the technique】
【The technique
is diabolical. The foreign material admixed were sand and dust before, but are
now iron powder, lead powder, glass powder, machine grease, talc etc】
(NB)
These kind of primitive types of admixture can no longer be seen these days, as
the government control has been tightened and the buyers have learned from
their experiences.
Ø
Since 1990s - Increasing admixture of foreign fibers
at the dehairing process
The cashmere industry
experienced a further radical change under the Economic Reform in China in
1990s. While Chinese textile industry overall remarkably evolved, Chinese
cashmere industry, in particular, showed phenomenal development, favored by the
domestic raw material supply, with expanded scale and accumulated capital. A
number of new players entered the industry and the supply chain became further
complex.
Admixtures of various foreign
fibers were attempted during the period. The variety of foreign fiber changed
time to time. When testing laboratory became capable to identify one foreign
fiber, another new type of foreign fiber was devised.
²
Early stage foreign
fibers.
As the conventional blending
material, such as merino wool, became easily detected by testing laboratories,
fibers of other animal, such as Angora rabbit or camel, were used. However, these
fibers, as they were, were also identified by microscope, became less utilized.
²
Modification of fiber
surface.
Morphological feature of a
fiber is the decisive factor in the determination of the species of animal, but
some attempts were made to modify the surface of fibers. The technique
originally intended for anti-shrinking (such as Kroy treatment) or softening,
were also applied for the modification of surface character.
Wool fiber treated in
Kroy Wool and Cashmere covered
with softening agent

(Source: Toyoboshi Kogyo) (Source:DWI)
Ø
Admixture of Yak
It is reported that admixture
of Yak became widespread in 1990s
Yak is a bovine animal inhabiting the regions of the
northern highland of the Asian continent, such as Tibet or Qing Hai in China.
Domestic Yak are used mainly for
transportation, food and milk. Its fibers are sometimes as fine as 17 micron,
and are not easily distinguished from cashmere. Yak fiber is used for blankets
and knitwear, but it is said that a considerable quantity is blended into
(出所www.ansi.okstate.edu/) Cashmere, although there is only
limited evidence on this.
Cashmere & Yak covered with softener Cashmere &
Yak

(Source:DWI) (Source:DWI)
Ø
Admixture of fibers of Non-cashmere goats
In various places in the
Asian continent, a variety of goats with useable textile fibers are found. The
typical example is Angora goat, of which fibers are widely used as “Mohair”.
There are also other various types of goats, of which fibers are used. As
hybridization is feasible within goat species, various hybrid goats were
generated through natural or artificial insemination in the long history.
One typical example of
controlled artificial hybrid goat is (genuine) Cashgora, which created by
insemination between Cashmere goat and Angora goat. Its fiber, “Cashgora” is
highly appreciated in the market for its unique luster and delicate handle, and
seldom admixed into Cashmere.
Cashmere and Cashgora Genuine Cashgora Goat

(Source:DWI) (www,angora.de/)
On the other hand, hybrid
goat between Cashmere goat and non-mohair goats as well as those between
non-cashmere and non-mohair goats are sometimes called “Cashgora” or
“Cashgora-type” in its popular name. These fibers can sometimes be admixed,
fradulently, into cashmere.
Caution must be taken, as
many of the fibers from these goats do no have morphological characteristic of
cashmere. These fibers are mainly produced out of China (Mongolia, Central Asia
etc), many of them are imported to China, and sometimes are blended into
cashmere. In some cases, the surfaces of these fibers are modified. (NB:
Mongolia and Central Asia are also areas producing high quality cashmere. The
above does not mean that the cashmere from these areas is of lower quality).
There are no accurate
statistics on those non-cashmere fibers, and the overall picture is not clearly
known. In any case, a fiber, even if it is of goat origin, is not deemed
cashmere if it does not have morphological feature of cashmere. A fiber, even
if it is of cashmere origin, is not deemed cashmere, if its surface is damaged
or modified and lost its morphological characteristics of cashmere.
Ø
Slipe Cashmere
While normally cashmere
fibers are down fibers collected from live goats, the fibers are sometimes
recovered from a dead body (or skin) of cashmere goats. The fibers recovered
from dead goats are called “slipe cashmere” and sometimes blended into normal
cashmere fibers. Usually strong chemical substance is used for separating
fibers from dead bodies or skin, and the surfaces of fibers could be damaged or
deformed. These fibers may not be recognized as cashmere in fiber testing.
Those fibers, which were collected from arms or legs of dead bodies may not
have typical morphological feature of cashmere, and therefore may not be
classified as cashmere.
Ø
Increasing admixture of Mian Yang Rong (Sheep
Cashmere) since 2000.
“Mian Yang Rong (sheep
cashmere)” is a down fiber collected from certain types of Chinese native
sheep, which are sometimes called “Mongolian sheep”. Photographs of typical
Mongolian sheep are shown below. (It is said that these kinds of sheep are
widely bred in China)
Breeding Mongolian Sheep
(Qinghe, He bei) Mongolian
Sheep(Tail inflates with fat)

(Source:Fukaki Woolen Textile
Co., Ltd)
Traditionally, Mongolian
sheep were bred for meat consumption. Unlike merino wool, the coarseness of
fibers of Mongolian sheep is not even. The double-layered fibers consist of
outer coarse hair and inner downy fibers. The downy fibers are sometimes as
fine as 17-18 micron, and their surface are smooth, and thus can be misjudged
as cashmere in microscope tests by unskilled analysts.
Raw fiber from Mongolian Goat(Double Layered)The fine downy wool is Mian Yang Rong

(Source:Fukaki Woolen Textile Co., Ltd)
Micrography of Mian Yang Rong
Corase wool and finer downy
wool 2 types
of wool coexist

(Source:Fukaki Woolen Textile Co.,
Ltd)(Source:Beijing Clothing
Technology)
Traditionally, Mongolian
sheep’s fiber was not utilized for textiles. However, when the technique of
dehairing cashmere widely diffused, it became a common knowledge that cotton
carding machines are also capable of dehaing Mongolian sheep wool. The downy
fiber become widely known, and traded as “Mian Yang Rong”. In Qinghe County of
He Bei Province, there are multiple trading markets specializing in Mian Yang
Rong. The photograph shown below is one of the stock points of Mian Yang Rong.
(
Source:Fukaki
Woolen Textile Co., Ltf.)
Compared
with cashmere, Mian Yang Rong is less expensive to buy and easy for the local
operators to collect, and thus deemed to be a good option for farmers’ side
business. Consequently, in Qinghe County, Mian Yang Rong is commonly traded.
Obviously, all the Miang Yang Rong is not admixed into Cashmere. There are
businesses for knitwear and weaving of Mian Yang Rong.
On
the other hand, however, Mian Yang Rong is regarded, by the dehairers, as a
convenient material for reducing the cost. The dehairers are said to be
exerting great efforts in pursuit for “Cashmere like handle”, with the
development of innovative technologies in softening and scale-off treatment.
This paper has discussed on
representative types of foreign fibers. In reality, various other foreign (or
deformed) fibers are candidates to be admixed into cashmere. Also continuous
developments are being made on the new types of foreign fibers, and technique
of modifications. It is very risky to be careless under the situation like
this.
The supply chain of cashmere
products manufactured in China and imported to Japan is, in a broad term,
something like the illustration below.
Figure-6 Supply Chain of Cashmere Products

The admixture of foreign fibers
takes place before the spinning process. The problems in the processes after
that will be caused by the misuse (inadequate use) of the yarns.
Admixture may take place at
any stage up to the Blending process.
Ø
Admixture in Raw Fiber
As aforementioned, admixture
of foreign material widely prevailed at the stage of breeders in the past. Even
today, there is a potential that intentional or unintentional admixture of
foreign fibers will take place.
There are cases where large
firms have annual contacts with breeders and the raw cashmere fibers are
collected under strict control. On the other hand, there are cases where
individual breeders bring small quantity to the exchange markets in the cities
like Qinghe. Also there are cases where brokers buy from individual breeders
each in small quantity. In the case of such small transactions, implementation
of strict testing is difficult. This may create opportunity for the admixture
of foreign fibers.
Ø
Admixture in the Dehairing Process
There are many reliable
dehairing plants in China where very strict quality control is implemented. On
the other hand, it is difficult to know what is exactly happening in the
numerous small factories born like “bamboo shoots after the rain”.
Ø
Admixture in the Blending Process
Spinning yarn is one of the
processes, in which admixture may possibly take place, as the fibers can be
blended in any proportion in the blending of fiber in preparation for spinning.
There is no possibility of admixture after that process.
Any problem after the
spinning is caused by using inadequate lot of yarn. It is thus important to pay
due attention on the adequacy of the usage of the yarns.
It is said that “Lot” control
is important to prevent problem. A “Lot”, in this case, means a lot of yarn
spun from one batch of blending fibers.
Generally, cashmere yarn is
dyed in fiber. Usually, a few to several different types of dehaired cashmere
are blended into one homogenized composition of yarn lot. “Same color” does not
mean the “same lot”. Sometimes, a sample is made of Lot-A, and the bulk
shipment goods are made of Lot-B. There were cases where only the samples were
flawless.
Needless to say, the
confirmation of the trustworthiness of the supplier is critical.
Also, it is important to
identify the type of business (the position in the supply chain) of the
supplier, whether it is a vertical operator from raw material to the finished
goods, or its main business is only a limited part of the supply chain. The
point of attention may be different depending on who the supplier is. It is
important to ascertain whether production is actually made in its own factory
or outsourced from other factories. There may be cases where the supplier
claims that they operate vertically (in a broad term), but actually the major
part (or sometimes all) of the production is outsourced to third parties.
Even with a credible
supplier, the risk of unintentional contamination exists It is advised not to
100% rely on the testing by other parties, but to carry out the own testing.
The effectiveness of fiber tests
in the Supply Chain need to be addressed.
Figure-7


The effectiveness of the
fiber testing is higher towards the down stream. The most effective way would
be to conduct tests on the finished goods on the retail shops. (At its extreme,
the tests in the up stream are not necessary if the integrity of quality is
confirmed at retail shops.) On the other hand, a test of a raw fiber at the
most up stream by a Japanese buyer has little effect, because anything may take
place afterwards.
However, it is far too late
to detect the problem after (or immediately before) the finished goods are
displayed in a retail shop. Payments may have already been done to the
supplier, and sometimes retailers demand compensation. Thus the risk grows
towards down stream.
Thus, in a realistic term,
tests also in the upstream are advisable. It depends on the type of the
supplier, how far one should go up. The main check points are “Dehairing”
“Spinning” and “Production of Finished Goods”. If the tests in the Finished
Goods are too late, one must consider to testing the Yarns. If the fiber
content of the Yarn is acceptable, then it is necessary to ascertain that the
relevant Yarns are actually used, at an earliest possible timing.
Even if no problem was
detected in the up stream tests, it is important to carry out random tests on
the finished goods actually shipped, to ascertain that there will be no trouble
later in the retails shops.
It is risky to carry out business
with an insufficient testing scheme in the complex supply chain. However, the
problem can be avoided with adequate knowledge and a proper testing scheme. In
case if it is difficult to establish such scheme by oneself, it may be useful
to make an alliance with a partner, who has sufficient information, experiences
and solid quality control scheme.
(NB: The necessity of
appropriate testing is applied not only for Chinese products, but for cashmere
products in general including those from other origins.)
CCMI currently recommends 17
laboratories in the world, based on the performance in the Round Trial, which
CCMI annually conducts. (www.cashmere.org/cm/testinglabs.php)The are 3 recommended laboratories in Japan as listed below.
Japan Wool Products Inspection Institute Foundation
Japan Spinners Inspecting Foundation
Japan Synthetic Textile Inspection Institute Foundation
Japanese laboratories carry
out regular technical meetings aiming to avoid conflicting test results among
them. CCMI intends to offer support to the laboratories for international
interactions, in order to avoid the discrepancies among different countries.
The testing method regulated
in JIS (Japan Industrial Standard) is microscopy. As the test depends on the
eyesight, the fiber which does not look like cashmere in the eyes of the tester
will not be classified as cashmere. Also, a fiber, the surface of which is
damaged or deformed by chemical or physical treatment, and not clear
discernable by the eyes of the testers, will not be deemed Cashmere.
Cashmere of which surface was
damaged by strong bleach

(Source: Toyoboshi Kogyo Co.,
Ltd)
The Definition of Cashmere,
advocated by CCMI, as mentioned below, was formally incorporated into the Laws
in USA.
The fine (dehaired) undercoat fibers produced by a Cashmere goat (Capra
hircus laniger). The fiber is general non-medullated and has a mean maximum
diameter of 19 microns. The co-efficient of variation around the mean shall not
exceed 24%. There can be no more than 3% (by weight) of cashmere fibers over 30
microns. (Reference IWTO Test Method 8-89).
The Wool Products Labeling
Act of 1939 in USA was revised as detailed below on 1st January 2007.
|
Old The Wool Products Labeling Act of 1939 |
New New Statute – 15 U.S.C. 68b(6) |
|
l
(Fiber
content of a product containing hair or fleece of the Cashmere Goat) |
l
The fine (dehaired)
undercoat fibers produced by a Cashmere goat (Capra hircus laniger). l
Has a mean maximum
diameter of 19 microns l
There can be no
more than 3% (by weight) of cashmere fibers over 30 microns. l
The co-efficient
of variation around the mean shall not exceed 24%. |
After incorporated in the Law
in USA, the Definition would be recognized as “De facto standard” also in
Europe.
6-2-3 Other
Analysis Methods
Currently, several new
analysis methods, including DNA analysis, are under research by various laboratories
in the world, but any technology which can wholly substitute for microscopy has
not yet been demonstrated. DNA analysis is capable of distinguishing the
species of animal, and it would be useful in identifying, for example, Mian
Yang Rong from cashmere. On the other hand DNA method is unable to distinguish
the different types of goats within the goat species. At this stage, DNA
analysis is a commendable technology to complement the weak points of
Microscopy.
(NB DNA is analysis is
impossible if DNA was damaged in the treatment process such as strong dying and
processing with chemical or heat)
(Contact)
3-17-18-501 Jiyugaoka, Meguro, Tokyo 152-0035
CCMI Japan Representative
Kenneth Shimizu
Tel/Fax 03-3723-9629
Email: kshimizu@cashmere.org